Book a consultation
Send us a message
elderly man with his head in his hands looking stressed

Trusts can help avoid guardianship, prevent potential for abuse in event of incapacity

by Legacy Plan
March 24, 2024

One of the most pressing estate planning concerns for many individuals is how to manage their affairs in the event of incapacity. Traditional approaches, such as guardianship and conservatorship, often come with their own set of problems.

Increasingly, people are turning to trusts, particularly revocable living trusts, as viable alternatives. The critical questions this article addresses include: What are the problems with guardianship? How does a trust avoid guardianship? What is the difference between a successor trustee and a guardian?

In addition, we will explore the differences between a revocable trust and an irrevocable trust. Understanding these elements is key to implementing estate planning strategies that prevent guardianship, thus protecting assets with a trust in the event of incapacity.

What is guardianship and conservatorship?

Guardianship and conservatorship are legal mechanisms established to protect and manage the personal and financial affairs of individuals deemed incapable of doing so themselves. These mechanisms are particularly relevant for those who, due to various reasons such as age, illness or disability, find themselves unable to make sound decisions or handle their day-to-day activities. Understanding these concepts is essential in the realm of estate planning and elder care.

Guardianship is a legal process where a court appoints a guardian to make personal and lifestyle decisions for an individual who is incapable of making these decisions independently. This arrangement is often used for minors without parents or capable relatives, or adults who are incapacitated due to a severe illness, injury or disability.

The role of a guardian can be quite comprehensive. For adults, guardians make decisions about health care, living arrangements and even social activities. In the case of minors, guardianship extends to almost all aspects of the child’s life, including educational decisions.

The process of establishing guardianship begins with a formal petition filed in court, usually by a family member or a close associate who notices the incapacity. Medical evidence is often required to prove the individual's inability to manage their own affairs. Once the court is convinced of the necessity for guardianship, it appoints a guardian entrusted to act in the best interests of the incapacitated individual.

an older set of hands holding a younger set of hands

Guardians are empowered with considerable responsibility and are often required to report back to the court about their management of the individual’s affairs so that decisions are made in the ward’s best interest.

Conservatorship, meanwhile, is similar to guardianship but primarily focuses on financial affairs. A conservator, appointed by the court, manages the financial assets and liabilities of an individual who is no longer able to do so due to mental incapacity, physical disability or age-related issues. This role includes responsibilities like paying bills, managing investments, collecting debts and handling day-to-day financial matters.

The process for establishing conservatorship is akin to that of guardianship, involving a legal proceeding where the need for a conservator is substantiated with evidence, usually medical, to prove the individual's incapacity in financial management. Once appointed, the conservator operates under court supervision and must regularly report on the financial status and handling of the incapacitated person’s assets.

While both guardianship and conservatorship are designed to protect vulnerable individuals, the key difference lies in the scope of their responsibilities. Guardianship is more comprehensive, covering personal and health-related decisions, whereas conservatorship is specifically tailored to manage financial matters.

Both roles come with a significant amount of oversight and accountability. Courts take these appointments seriously, as guardians and conservators have considerable control over important aspects of an individual’s life. Regular reporting and court supervision are integral parts of both processes, designed to protect the interests of those who cannot protect themselves.

What are the problems with guardianship and conservatorship?

Guardianship and conservatorship come with inherent problems that include:

  • Loss of autonomy. The person under guardianship loses control over personal and financial decisions.

  • Legal and emotional complexities. The process can be legally complex and emotionally challenging, as it often involves proving the individual’s incapacity in court.

  • Financial and time costs. The process can be expensive and time-consuming, often requiring ongoing legal involvement.

While guardianship is established with the best intentions, it can, unfortunately, lead to situations where the adult ward becomes vulnerable to exploitation. This issue is multi-faceted and involves various forms of abuse and misuse of authority by the guardian.

Booklet opening animation of our free requestable booklet 'What is Estate Planning'

One of the most significant areas of concern is the financial exploitation of adult wards by their guardians. A guardian may misuse the ward's funds for personal gain. This includes unauthorized use of the ward's money, assets or property, ranging from small-scale theft to large-scale embezzlement. Sometimes, exploitation is not outright theft but stems from poor financial management or decision-making that benefits the guardian at the ward’s expense. Also, some guardians may overcharge for their services, draining the ward’s financial resources unnecessarily.

Beyond financial abuse, guardians can also exploit wards emotionally and physically, often because of the imbalance of power in the relationship. Guardians may neglect the basic needs of the ward, such as adequate health care, nutrition or social interaction, either due to indifference or as a means of control.

There’s also the potential for psychological abuse, which can include verbal intimidation and other forms of mental manipulation.

The exploitation of adult wards by guardians is facilitated by various systemic issues, including:

  • Lack of oversight. In many jurisdictions, the court system that appoints guardians does not have adequate resources to monitor them effectively. This lack of oversight can allow unscrupulous guardians to exploit their wards without detection.

  • Inadequate vetting process. Sometimes, guardians are appointed without thorough background checks or consideration of their capability and integrity.

  • Legal complexity. The legal process of challenging a guardian's actions can be complex and costly, making it difficult for concerned parties or the wards themselves to seek redress.

Unfortunately, the consequences of such exploitation are profound and long-lasting. Financial exploitation, for example, can leave wards in dire economic circumstances, often when they are most vulnerable and in need of resources. Meanwhile, the psychological impact of exploitation, especially by someone entrusted to protect the ward’s interests, can lead to long-term emotional trauma and a breakdown of trust.

In addition, neglect and abuse can directly lead to a deterioration in the physical and mental health of the ward.

Guardianship avoidance has thus become a key component of effective estate planning.

Can a trust be used to avoid guardianship?

someone signing a trust document

Trusts, specifically revocable living trusts, play a pivotal role in avoiding guardianship and provide for the management of assets and decision making when the grantor is incapacitated. Unlike guardianship, which involves court intervention, a trust allows for a more seamless transition of decision-making authority to the successor trustee appointed by the grantor.

At its core, a trust is a legal entity where a trustee manages assets for the benefit of another. The types of trusts vary, with the revocable living trust and irrevocable trust being particularly noteworthy.

Unlike guardianship, which necessitates court intervention, a trust can allow for a smoother transition of decision-making power to the trustee in case the grantor becomes incapacitated. This transition, predefined in the trust agreement, bypasses the need for court involvement, thus avoiding the drawbacks of guardianship and conservatorship.

Trusts offer multiple benefits in the context of incapacity, such as:

  • Maintained autonomy. The grantor predetermines how the trust should operate, allowing them to maintain control over how their assets are managed and distributed.

  • Privacy and efficiency. Trusts are private arrangements, unlike guardianship proceedings, which are part of the public record. This privacy is coupled with the efficiency of avoiding protracted legal procedures.

  • Customizability. Trusts can be tailored to specific needs and circumstances, offering flexibility that guardianship cannot provide.

How can you use a trust for incapacity planning?

Creating a trust for incapacity planning involves defining the trust document. This is a detailed legal agreement outlining the trust’s terms, the trustee's role and beneficiary rights.

Deciding between a revocable living trust or an irrevocable trust is crucial, based on the individual's specific needs and estate planning goals.

By understanding the nuances of trusts and how they can be used to avoid guardianship or conservatorship in cases of incapacity, individuals can make informed decisions about their estate planning. This approach not only ensures the protection of assets but also preserves personal autonomy and dignity in situations where one might be unable to make decisions independently.

What’s the difference between a revocable trust and an irrevocable trust to avoid guardianship?

irrevocable trust document, cash and a note labeled as revocable trust

The difference between a revocable living trust and an irrevocable trust in terms of avoiding guardianship lies primarily in their structure and the control retained by the person who creates the trust (the grantor).

A revocable living trust is a trust that can be altered or revoked by the grantor at any time during their lifetime. This flexibility is a key characteristic. In terms of avoiding guardianship, the grantor can maintain control over the trust’s assets as long as they are capable. They typically act as the trustee, managing the assets according to the trust's terms.

The trust can include provisions for a successor trustee to step in and manage the trust's affairs if the grantor becomes incapacitated. This avoids the need for a court-appointed guardian or conservator, as the trust already has a mechanism in place for managing the assets and the grantor’s financial affairs.

In contrast, an irrevocable trust, once established, generally cannot be altered or revoked. The grantor relinquishes control over the assets placed in the trust. Unlike a revocable trust, the grantor gives up control over the trust assets immediately upon the creation of the trust. A designated trustee manages the trust.

Since the grantor does not retain control over the trust, the issue of managing the trust’s assets in the event of the grantor’s incapacity is inherently addressed. The trustee continues to manage the trust without the need for a guardian or conservator.

Irrevocable trusts are often used for asset protection and estate tax planning, which can be a consideration in broader estate planning, including planning for incapacity.

So, both types of trusts can be effective in avoiding the need for guardianship or conservatorship, but they do so in different ways. Revocable trusts allow for a smooth transition of control if the grantor becomes incapacitated, with the successor trustee taking over the management of the trust's assets. Irrevocable trusts remove the assets from the grantor’s direct control entirely, making the issue of the grantor’s incapacity less relevant in terms of asset management.

In conclusion, while both revocable and irrevocable trusts can be tools to avoid guardianship, they differ in the degree of control retained by the grantor and the timing of the transfer of control. The choice between the two will depend on the individual’s specific circumstances, goals, and need for flexibility.

How do I create an estate plan?

There are numerous options and scenarios to consider when developing an estate plan that protects your legacy and achieves your objectives, and important decisions should be made with the advice of qualified lawyers and financial experts. Membership with Legacy Assurance Plan provides members with valuable resources and guidance to develop comprehensive estate plans that take life's contingencies into consideration and leave a positive impact for generations to come. Legacy Assurance Plan members also receive peace of mind that a team of trusted, experienced professionals will assist them in developing legal, financial and tax strategies that will meet their needs today and for years to come through periodic reviews.

This article is published by Legacy Assurance Plan and is intended for general informational purposes only. Some information may not apply to your situation. It does not, nor is it intended, to constitute legal advice. You should consult with an attorney regarding any specific questions about probate, living probate or other estate planning matters. Legacy Assurance Plan is an estate planning services company and is not a lawyer or law firm and is not engaged in the practice of law. For more information about this and other estate planning matters visit our website at

Phone - 844.445.3422
Email -
25 common estate planning mistakes booklet

Don't make estate planning mistakes. Avoid common mistakes with our free guide,
"25 Common Estate Planning Mistakes"

Legacy Assurance Plan Shield Logo
Subscribe to Our Monthly Newsletter!

We won't share your email, and we make it easy to unsubscribe!